Richard Dawkins sends people to CreationOnTheWeb
Creationists battling on the blog of antitheist Richard Dawkins often link to articles on CreationOnTheWeb.com. 57% of the many visitors to our website who come from Dawkins’ site are new to CreationOnTheWeb. And in general, visitors from such anti-creationist sites tend to stay longer and look at more material than visitors from
‘friendly’ sites. Isn’t that great?
When you are taking part in a blog or web forum, it’s easy to link to CreationOnTheWeb. After you’ve found a suitable creationist article using the search box on our front page, paste the link into your reply with HTML code like this:
See
<a href="
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/xxxx"
target="_blank" > this article </a>.
In this case the red text is the address of the link, the green text is the HTML code which will not appear, and the black text is what will be visible on the blog. The xxxx is the number of our web page.
For example, the following pasted text:
See <a href="http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5479" target="_blank" >this article</a>.
will appear in the blog as:
See this article.
and will link to article number 5479 in a new window when it is clicked.
(Sometimes you can simply put the url in the blog like this:
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5479
and the blog will automatically format it. But it may not.)
Check the posting instructions on your particular blog. Give it a try. You will learn by experience.
CreationOnTheWeb has fascinating and useful information to help Christians defend their faith (1 Peter 3:15) and refute anti-Christian arguments (2 Corinthians 10:4–5). For example:
Christians should engage the culture,
not withdraw from it
This might mean changing popular ‘Christianese’, so Christians, planning your next retreat? How about an advance instead? This is a wake-up call 
comparing how many in the church have failed to recognize the tactics of leading anti-Christians, which have already moved from marginalization and ridicule to overt persecution.
In some churches, the retreat from the atheistic advance has also affected core teachings. While many claim that Genesis is a ‘side issue’, conceding the Bible’s history to atheists has emboldened attacks on the absolutely indispensible doctrines of Christianity. See The naturalist attack on the Virginal Conception and Resurrection.
But strangely enough, some of the retreat stems from Loving the Bible too much. How can a Bible-believing Christian love the Bible too much? When this love is misplaced so the Bible is protected from even the possibility that history might prove it wrong. But the Christian faith is based on real history, so it is folly to separate the Bible from the real world. This desire to make the Bible unfalsifiable is also behind the objection to our stand that intelligent alien life is incompatible with Scripture. See this feedback.
However, sometimes Christians wanting to engage the culture use logically fallacious arguments. For example, scientists recently discovered the pygmy possum can hibernate for a year, but this can’t be used to claim that all the Ark animals hibernated for a year. In any case, it is not necessary—see Hibernation, Migration and the Ark. It is encouraging that Arguments we think creationists should NOT use is the 8th most read page on our site.
